Comments on: Who is Worthy of Digg’s Pixels?
http://blog-well.com/2009/10/12/who-is-worthy-of-diggs-pixels/
Musings and things that amuse usMon, 06 Sep 2010 02:18:46 +0000http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2hourly1By: Student aid
http://blog-well.com/2009/10/12/who-is-worthy-of-diggs-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-9000
Student aidThu, 04 Feb 2010 05:35:23 +0000http://blog-well.com/?p=666#comment-9000The Pixel is the generating picture on the monitor. very nice article topic.The Pixel is the generating picture on the monitor. very nice article topic.
]]>By: Politics
http://blog-well.com/2009/10/12/who-is-worthy-of-diggs-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-8979
PoliticsSat, 30 Jan 2010 09:55:44 +0000http://blog-well.com/?p=666#comment-8979The term pixel is used to refer to a single scalar element of a multi-component representation (more precisely called a photo site in the camera sensor context), while in others the term may refer to the entire set of such component intensities for a spatial position.Very good articleThe term pixel is used to refer to a single scalar element of a multi-component representation (more precisely called a photo site in the camera sensor context), while in others the term may refer to the entire set of such component intensities for a spatial position.Very good article
]]>By: Review of Textlinks.com
http://blog-well.com/2009/10/12/who-is-worthy-of-diggs-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-8576
Review of Textlinks.comTue, 10 Nov 2009 19:54:44 +0000http://blog-well.com/?p=666#comment-8576<strong>Review of Textlinks.com...</strong>
Great review of this link building site...Review of Textlinks.com…
Great review of this link building site…
]]>By: Chas Edwards
http://blog-well.com/2009/10/12/who-is-worthy-of-diggs-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-5142
Chas EdwardsTue, 13 Oct 2009 02:12:36 +0000http://blog-well.com/?p=666#comment-5142Why is that statement inane? When marketers "speak the local language" of the media platforms they buy into, it is more effective with readers / viewers / listeners of that media, and thus it works better for the advertisers who continue to support that media with their advertising dollars. TV commercials (think 1958) that spoke in the language of radio were terrible.... To be clear, Digg is charging money for Digg Ads, and that income will be part of what allows us to build & run Digg as a free service to readers. Didn't mean to be coy about that part!Why is that statement inane? When marketers “speak the local language” of the media platforms they buy into, it is more effective with readers / viewers / listeners of that media, and thus it works better for the advertisers who continue to support that media with their advertising dollars. TV commercials (think 1958) that spoke in the language of radio were terrible…. To be clear, Digg is charging money for Digg Ads, and that income will be part of what allows us to build & run Digg as a free service to readers. Didn’t mean to be coy about that part!
]]>